Why mega-merger mania is taking the lead in the mining industry.

Spread the love

The Rio Tinto Group logo atop the Central Park Tower, which houses the company’s offices, in Perth, Australia, Friday, Jan. 17, 2025.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The mining sector looks poised for a bumper trading year following market speculation about a possible tie-up between industry giants Rio Tinto and Glencore.

It comes after the Bloomberg news reported British-Australian multinational Rio Tinto and Switzerland-based Glencore were in preliminary merger talks on Thursday, although it was not said whether the talks were still going live.

Separately, Reuters reported Glencore approached Rio Tinto late last year about the possibility of combining their businesses, a source familiar with the matter said on Friday. The news agency reported that the brief talks are no longer considered active.

Rio Tinto and Glencore both declined to comment when contacted by CNBC.

The merger between Rio Tinto, the world’s second largest miner, and Glencore, one of the world’s largest coal companies, would be the biggest ever in the mining industry.

Combined, the two firms will have a market value of nearly $150 billion, leapfrogging the longtime industry leader. BHPIt is worth about 127 billion dollars.

Analysts were widely skeptical about the merits of the Rio Tinto-Glencore merger, which would leave limited synergies, Rio Tinto’s complex Double structure And strategic differences over coal and corporate culture are challenges to concluding a deal.

“I think everybody’s a little bit surprised,” Maxime Koge, equity analyst at Odo BHF, told CNBC by phone.

“Actually, stackable assets are limited. It’s only copper when there’s some synergy and opportunity to add assets to create a larger group,” Koge said.

Global mining giants are considering the benefits of mega-mergers to boost their position in the energy transition, especially with demand for metals such as copper in the coming years.

Due to the development of electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels and energy storage systems, among other applications, copper is expected to face a shortage of highly mobile metal.

Rio Tinto’s long-delayed and new projects are now “very difficult” for big mining companies to bring online, said Odo BHF’s Koge. Controversial As an example of solution copper mining in the US.

“It’s a very promising copper project, maybe one of the biggest in the world, but it’s full of problems and somehow getting another company is a way to really accelerate the expansion into copper,” he said.

“For me, the deal is not that attractive,” he added. “It goes against what all these groups have tried to do in the past.”

Last year, BHP made a $49 billion bid for smaller rival Anglo American.

Some analysts, including those at JPMorgan, expect another unsolicited offer for Anglo American to materialize in 2025.

M&A parliamentary games

The company’s logo was It adorns the side of BHP’s global headquarters in Melbourne on February 21, 2023. – The Australian multinational, a leading producer of metallurgical coal, iron ore, nickel, copper and potash, said net profit fell 32 percent year-on-year. year to $6.46 billion in the six months to December 31. (Photo by William West/AFP) (Photo by William West/AFP via Getty Images)

William West | Afp | Getty Images

Analysts led by Ben Davies at RBC Capital Markets said it was unclear whether talks between Rio Tinto and Glencore would result in a simple merger or the break-up of parts of each company.

Regardless, he said the M&A parliamentary games, which have been raised following merger talks between BHP and Anglo American, will undoubtedly “commence in earnest”.

“Glencore, once Rio Tinto’s key shareholder Chinalco, approached for a merger in July 2014 but still comes as a surprise,” RBC Capital Markets analysts said in a research note published on Thursday.

BHP’s move to acquire Anglo American is likely to trigger talks between Rio Tinto and Glencore, analysts said, with the former looking to gain more copper exposure and the latter seeking an exit strategy for larger shareholders.

“We don’t expect a direct merger to happen as we believe Rio’s shareholders will see it as supporting Glencore, but (it could) be possible to have a deal structure that makes both shareholders and management happy,” he added.

Copper, coal and culture

Analysts led by Wen Li at CreditSights speculate on the Rio Tinto-Glencore merger, raising questions about strategic alignment and corporate culture.

“Strategically, Rio Tinto can focus on Glencore’s copper assets, which will focus on durable and future metals. In addition, Glencore’s marketing business can provide synergies and expand Rio Tinto’s reach,” analysts at CreditSights said in a research note published on Friday. .

“However, Rio Tinto’s lack of interest in coal assets, due to recent transfers, any merger will require careful structuring to avoid unwanted asset overlaps,” he said.

A mining truck with a full load of coal at the Tweefontein coal mine operated by Glencore Plc October 16, 2024 in Tweefontein, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.

Per-anders Peterson | Getty Images News | Getty Images

In terms of culture, CreditSights analysts said Rio Tinto was known for its conservative approach and focus on stability, while Glencore had a reputation for “constantly pushing the envelope in its operations”.

“This cultural divide could create challenges in integration and decision-making if the merger continues,” CreditSights analysts said.

“If this materialises, it could have wider implications for mega deals in the metals (and) mining space, potentially bringing BHP/Anglo American back into the game,” he added.

— CNBC’s Ganesh Rao contributed to this report.

Similar Posts